Let’s talk about what really matters to all people as “the criteria to judge” that is, if people even care to do so. It’s obvious people do care very much when it concerns their personal lives or those they directly love and value but what about someone they don’t personally know?
Another author has penned his opinion of Chris Nemelka, albeit somewhat less critically biased than an otherwise growing list of detractors. Mr McKeever did report some dates and events correctly, yet responsible informative reporting should focus on the author’s content rather than the author.
An obvious flaw in Bill’s opinion is that the organization claiming to have a sole solution to end worldwide poverty and inequality “pales” in comparison to one man’s former life! How can critical scrutiny of one person be justified over entire world populations’ miserable circumstances?
Critics needlessly negate a man, yet ignore a simple plan by probing no further than its name.
Mr. McKeever asks why should people listen to Nemelka, thus missing the point all together as critics often do. If any author-critic would write an informative piece and give readers something real to think about, focus on the content of the books Mr. Nemelka has published and negate the sensible evidence in them if possible. This content will continue to stand as the only practical solution available worldwide.
On the other hand, regardless of the amount of criticism writers and experts will continue to publish; none has yet to offer a better solution to the globe’s economic upheaval and human affliction, because there simply is no other.
The logical response to all criticism remains now and forever, what could be more practical and important to a world in constant chaos and human misery; to censor one person, or probe and prove, either correct or incorrect, the only solution offered to a collective humanity for all their sake, which still no critic to date has dared to attempt?
What more truth could humanity possibly need or want than a flawless plan to improve the world of human existence? Judge the criteria that really matters. If it’s true then Christopher is true- if it is not, then he is not – it’s that simple, and if it is true then its more than the perfect time to put the plan into action – if it isn’t true then it just doesn’t even matter; but people, you owe it to yourselves and humanity to prove this one way or the other!
Hopefully critics will attend the symposium March 19th, and either show why this plan is flawed or concede and tell the world; There is no better plan for ALL of humanity and maybe people will get behind it… if they truly care.