We’ve explained in some detail in previous posts why we were forced to lie in order to teach the Real Truth, or rather, why we instructed a True Messenger to lie. Keep in mind, we first contacted Christopher and attempted to recruit him to our cause in 1991, but it wasn’t until the end of 2003 before he fully accepted his role with us.
Christopher was living with his wife, Jackie, and his four oldest children in Kent, Washington. Their renovated school bus was parked on the property of Rick and Joy Church. It was at this time when we first approached Christopher, although we had been following him incognito, as far as he knew, since his enlightenment experience on June 16, 1987.
Our first offer (in 1991) was eagerly accepted by Christopher. We instructed him and helped him move his family to Montana, where his two oldest children could have more access and contact with their own mother, thus mitigating any possibility of further legal problems from the courts. A series of events occurred within a short amount of time that resulted in Christopher losing his two oldest children, of whom he had full legal custody and control at the time. When he lost his children, and realizing that the path he would be forced to take as a True Messenger wouldn’t get any easier, Christopher stopped cooperating and refused to do what we would require of him.
In order to perform his role properly, Christopher would be forced to lie to people, only revealing portions of the Real Truth as we would instruct him. It is quite easy for one to understand why we needed to lie. Imagine if we were to approach a religious person who believes in God, and who knows no other details or explanations about Real Truth, and proclaim,
“Your god is not real; your religious beliefs are all false; you’re the only god that exists; your brain is responsible for all the spiritual feelings that you feel are coming from God; the family unit is the most corrupt unit of any social order that would bring peace upon earth,” and a plethora of other things that directly confront everything that brings a religious person self-worth, value, and a purpose in life.
Rebelling against us soon after he lost his children in 1991, Christopher embarked on a series of unfortunate events as he tried to teach people the Real Truth without referencing the information to a person’s current beliefs. He failed miserably and hurt a lot more people than he helped. He was not able to convince one person of the Real Truth that he had known since 1987. What Christopher experienced during these rebellious times taught him many things and helped prepare him for his role, which he finally accepted in November of 2003. He learned the value of using the lies in which people believed in order to help them see the lies of their beliefs.
We spent not a few days with Christopher at first in order to help him understand why he had to lie and how he had to lie.
We told him a riddle that is widely known but rarely used, to explain to Christopher how a True Messenger can use logic to lead a person to the right choice:
You are a prisoner in a room with 2 doors and 2 guards. One of the doors will guide you to freedom and behind the other is a hangman—you don’t know which is which.
One of the guards always tells the truth and the other always lies. You don’t know which one is the truth-teller or the liar either. You have to choose and open one of these doors, but you can only ask a single question to one of the guards.
So what is the SINGLE QUESTION that you would ask both guards?
The only logical question you could ask each is:
What door will the other guard say is the correct door?
Each guard will answer the same and tell you to choose the exact same door. But then you can logically deduce that you must choose the OTHER door towards which the guards did not point you.
Because if you asked the truth-guard, the truth-guard would tell you that the liar-guard would point to the door that leads to death. If you asked the liar-guard, the liar-guard would tell you that the truth-guard would point to the door that leads to death.
Therefore, no matter whom you ask, you pick the other door than the one that either tells you in response to your one question.
Although this is how a person should use common sense and logic, most people will have to read the riddle and its solution many times before finally grasping the logic of it. Why?
Because most people do not have the ability or Free Will to use pure common sense. Common sense must be pure and unadulterated for one to possess the ability to reason and assess information according to strict principles of validity, in other words, think logically.
It appears more logical to a religious person that God created the universe than to a scientific person. To a scientific person that has studied scientific theory and conclusion, a Big Bang makes more sense.
Each person is prejudiced towards their own beliefs and the system by which each acquires their beliefs. However, there are many scientists who have reviewed all the scientific information available that still believe that God exists; that if there was a Big Bang that created the universe, then it was God who made the bang. Otherwise, the scientist can’t explain what caused the Big Bang. The religious scientist can accept the Theory of Evolution as the way that God created the animals and plants. In fact, religious people are more open-minded than scientists, but not as humble. Where a scientist might conclude that science does not know all the answers, a not-so-humble religious person has an answer for everything: their particular God.
One of the most renown thinkers of modern time, Albert Einstein, concluded that,
“Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by the age of eighteen.”
Einstein lived in a very religious home during his childhood but at the early age of twelve, he began to search for a better understanding of things. He turned to science and read as many popular science books as he could find. Science made a lot more sense to him than religion. It didn’t take Einstein long to realize that the Bible was completely fictitious but he was never able to explain what the Bible was and why the men who wrote it had lied. Had he tried to explain it at such a young age, he would have been mocked and persecuted by his family, friends, and peers.
Einstein’s conclusion about human existentialism was summed up in a few words he wrote the year before he died:
“A human being is part of the whole called by us universe, a part limited in time and space. We experience ourselves, our thoughts and feelings as something separate from the rest. A kind of optical delusion of consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and to affection for a few persons nearest to us. Our task must be to free ourselves from the prison by widening our circle of compassion to embrace all living creatures and the whole of nature in its beauty. The true value of a human being is determined by the measure and the sense in which they have obtained liberation from the self. We shall require a substantially new manner of thinking if humanity is to survive.” (Albert Einstein, 1954)
Einstein could not explain what this “new manner of thinking” was supposed to be. He had no clue what would save humanity, except that it had to be an entirely different way of thinking than how the world was used to thinking. Einstein did not know the Real Truth.
As we have been observing our mortal experiences on Earth as advanced humans, and it is in our best interests to save humanity and preserve our ability to utilize this universe and the earth as the platform on which we play the game of mortal life, what can we do to help our mortal Selves save humanity?
Obviously, mortals who spend their entire life thinking about things, whether with a scientific, philosophical, or religious mind, will never figure out what this “substantially new manner of thinking” should be, because they are using the “old manner of thinking” to figure it out.
Scientists would say that we should think more scientifically to save humanity. Philosophers would say that we should think more philosophically. The religious would say that we must depend more on God and Christ to save humanity; that prayers will save us when God intervenes; otherwise, there is no other way.
IF we didn’t base our understanding on science, philosophy, or religion, and we used own brain, once we’ve gotten rid of all the prejudice that we have acquired from these three general ways of thinking; if we were smart and logical, and used pure, unadulterated common sense, we would not pick the door to which science, philosophy, and religion points us. Because each claims to be right, and we know that none of them can be right because so many different people disagree, then our common sense should tell us that none of these old manners of thinking can be right.
Real Truth can save humanity. Understanding things as the really are, as they really were, and as they really will be, is the only one way to save the human race. There is no other way.
How do we introduce this “substantially new manner of thinking”? Who do we choose to introduce it?
In 1820, our advanced Selves chose a young American boy who was, at that time, like Einstein, searching for a better understanding of things.
Einstein wrote of the time that he began to search for understanding as early as twelve years old:
“Through the reading of popular scientific books I soon reached the conviction that much in the stories of the Bible could not be true. The consequence was a positively fanatic orgy of freethinking coupled with the impression that youth is intentionally being deceived by the state through lies; it was a crushing impression. Mistrust of every kind of authority grew out of this experience, a skeptical attitude toward the convictions that were alive in any specific social environment—an attitude that has never again left me, even though, later on, it has been tempered by a better insight into the causal connections.” (Einstein, Albert, 1949 autobiography.)
Our early nineteenth Century True Messenger wrote about his youth and what he was going through before he received his enlightenment of Real Truth:
“During this time of great excitement my mind was called up to serious reflection and great uneasiness; but though my feelings were deep and often poignant, still I kept myself aloof from all these parties, though I attended their several meetings as often as occasion would permit. In process of time my mind became somewhat partial to the Methodist sect, and I felt some desire to be united with them; but so great were the confusion and strife among the different denominations, that it was impossible for a person young as I was, and so unacquainted with men and things, to come to any certain conclusion who was right and who was wrong. … In the midst of this war of words and tumult of opinions, I often said to myself: What is to be done? Who of all these parties are right; or, are they all wrong together? If any one of them be right, which is it, and how shall I know it?”
Joseph Smith was barely fourteen years old when he was enlightened by the Real Truth. This enlightenment happened inside his mind when he was allowed to connect to the energy and understanding of his advanced Self. Since Joseph didn’t read any popular scientific books, his mind was not prejudiced against the Real Truth that immediately flowed into his mind. Where Einstein was prejudiced towards science by reading many scientific books before he was eighteen, Joseph Smith hadn’t read one. Joseph Smith did not have a collection of prejudices that distorted and impaired his common sense.
After his enlightenment on April 6, 1820, Joseph Smith no longer had common sense, nor did he need logic in order to understand things. He had not learned from books. He did not learn the Real Truth. It was immediately given to him, or rather, he had immediate access to all Real Truth after his brain was allowed access.
The same thing happened to Christopher, although Christopher was twenty-five years old and already well indoctrinated in religion. Religion had distorted and impaired Christopher’s common sense. Like most people who do not question their beliefs at an early age, as Albert Einstein and Joseph Smith did, Christopher’s common sense was useless in his search for understanding. The only things that made sense to him was what fit in with his understanding and belief in God. There was no way to convince him of, or teach Christopher the Real Truth. It had to be given him all at once.
We knew about Christopher’s enlightenment when it happened, but as we did with the young Joseph Smith, whom we did not approach and recruit until almost 3 years after his enlightenment (in September of 1822), we eventually approached Christopher.
Since Christopher had a contrast belief system of extreme prejudice that he had acquired by the age of twenty-five, and he could remember his former beliefs and the way that they had affected his mind, it was hard for us to convince Christopher to revert back to those beliefs so that he could help others out of those same beliefs. Joseph Smith hadn’t developed such a thick skin from his previous beliefs, so it was much easier to get the young Joseph to accept our manner of teaching than it was to convince Christopher. It took Christopher over twelve years to finally understand why he had to lie to people in order to open their minds to the Real Truth.
The riddle about the truth-guard and the liar-guard made perfect sense to Christopher when we used it to help illustrate why he should always tell the Real Truth by pointing a person to what a False Messenger would tell them.
A little child thinks logically.
Each human born into this world possesses the ability to reason and assess information according to strict principles of validity in what they see, hear, touch, taste and smell. Little children do not think scientifically, philosophically, or religiously. They simply think.
Little children see a grove of trees and do not worry about why the trees are there or how they got there or who put them there or when they were put there, they just know that the trees are there because they follow “strict principles of validity in what they see, hear, touch, taste and smell.” They can see the trees, hear the trees bustling in the wind, they can touch the trees and taste, and smell them. They use pure, unadulterated common sense. And no scientist, philosopher, or religious person enjoys a bunch of trees like little children can.
The Real Truth is very logical and can be understood with pure, unadulterated common sense. It can be understood when a person utilizes the unique human ability to reason and assess information according to strict principles of validity in what they see, hear, touch, taste and smell. One will never understand the Real Truth through the prejudices of science, philosophy, or religion.
For this reason, we wrote:
“If we could get scientists to be humble enough and stop thinking about theoretical science and concentrate on the things that we have observed, are observing, and will observe in the future, we might start compiling some actual evidence of how things really are, how things really were in the past, and then we would have a good idea of how things are really going to be in the future. Again, this is the basis for Real Truth.
“A scientist is going to be very reluctant to admit that all scientific theories are simply theories: suppositions and ideas. It would be hard to convince one that all those years of studying each other’s theories, reading each other’s ideas, and inventing new ones are useless.
“A child can understand the Real Truth. Ask a child, ‘Do you know where this long-stemmed rose came from?’ If we teach the child the Real Truth, then the child will respond, ‘People made it.’ Ask a child where their puppy came from. If we teach the child the Real Truth, then the child will respond, ‘People made it.’ Ask a child, ‘What happened to West African Black Rhinoceros, the Pyrenean Ibex, the Passenger Pigeon, the Quagga, the Caribbean Monk Seal, the Sea Mink, the Tasmanian tiger, the Tecopa Pupfish, or the dodo bird?’ If we teach the child the Real Truth, then the child will respond, ‘People made them extinct.’
“If we only taught the Real Truth to children, based ONLY on what we can empirically prove to them by observing what is going on currently in our world, and we asked them, ‘Who created the dinosaurs and how were the dinosaurs all killed?’ They would easily understand the answer, perfectly, ‘We did.’ Instead, a scientist came up with the ridiculous theory, for one of many examples, that a big asteroid killed all the dinosaurs. Now, if that isn’t going to instill fear and worry in a child’s mind, we don’t know what will! All religious belief came as a result of fear and ignorance.”
Christopher is the one who is compiling all of the information we have provided him over the years in order to present this information to people according to their ability to understand these things. After reading his presentation of some of this information yesterday, we instructed the Moderators of this social media venue to ask for public comments about what Christopher had summarized. It was our desire to help Christopher accept what we have been trying to explain to him for many years: it takes a person becoming AS a little child, if the person is going to be able to understand the Real Truth.
We wrote in response to some of the public comments:
“It is quite evident that there will be much confusion unless the information we have is presented in the simplest format and in the simplest way, and in its entirety. … We are seeing the invalidity of using scientific expression similarly to using religious expression to convey the meaning of Real Truth.”
Actually, Christopher is seeing this. We’ve known it all along.
Because Christopher was instructed to use religious lies in order to teach the Real Truth to religious people, he assumes that he must use scientific lies in order to teach the Real Truth to scientists, or philosophical lies to philosophers. This might have made sense and been reasonable, IF using religious lies had been more successful at helping more religious people consider the Real Truth. For over a decade Christopher used religious lies in order to help religious people, with very limited success. We never criticized or corrected Christopher. We let him learn as he has always learned, how all of us must learn, by his mistakes.
Finally, after many years and much patience, because of the response to his summary of Real Truth given yesterday, Christopher can see his mistake in the way he wants to present concepts of Real Truth.
Einstein summarized before he died,
“We shall require a substantially new manner of thinking if humanity is to survive.”
It is Christopher’s role to introduce a new manner of thinking. Science, philosophy, and religion are the old manner of thinking.
Because of these worldly valued genres of thinking, our world is on the brink of self-destruction.
The Real Truth is the ONLY thing that can save humanity. It must be explained as it would be explained to a little child, but regardless, unless one is willing to become as a little child, one can in nowise receive these things. Again I say unto you, you must repent of everything that science, philosophy, and religion has taught you and baptize yourself in pure, unadulterated common sense. You must utilize the unique human ability to reason and assess information according to strict principles of validity ONLY in what you see, hear, touch, taste and smell. You must become as a little child, not a little child again, but AS a little child’s common sense works.
If the world continues to use distorted and impaired common sense, if people cannot set aside science, philosophy, and religion, and humbly admit that these general “manner[s] of thinking” have created all of our problems, humanity will NOT survive much longer.
Our True Selves are very much involved in what this Marvelous Work and a Wonder® is doing in order to introduce a substantially new manner of thinking.
Finally, Christoper is learning from his mistakes. He finally understands that he no longer has to lie. He no longer has to use the lies of religion, of science, or of philosophy to introduce concepts of Real Truth. He must avoid using examples from these three general genres of how people think. He must help us present the Real Truth in our upcoming book, The Dream of Mortal Life, Understanding Human Reality, as if he were writing it for little children with pure, unadulterated common sense.
We have counseled him to return to his own manner of thinking to how he thought and perceived things after June 16, 1987. When he left his religion that day, or rather, when his religion left his mind, he never looked back. He knew he couldn’t tell anyone what had happened to him or they would think he was crazy and they might take away his beloved children. He didn’t think again about his former religion until we explained that he needed to if he was going to reach the religious. He didn’t tell anyone, but his beloved children were taken away anyway.
Since few listen to Real Truth, because of the great hold that the world’s “old manner of thinking” has over the minds of people, our only hope is to present things as they really are, as they really have been in the past, and as they really will be in the future: a substantially new manner of thinking.
The world is on the brink of destruction, not because of what the earth is doing, has done or will do, but because of what humans are doing. The same thing happened in the past, five different times. This is why we know that the same thing is going to happen in the future. We know this exact time from mathematical algorithms that we developed based on what happened five times in the past. The same thing will happen again,
People become as a little child.
And whoso shall declare more or less than what a little child can understand, and establish it for truth, this person is contributing to the demise of humanity.