The MWAW Critic’s Corner; Frenemies and Legion; Harry Dschaak and David Ralph Bishop, a former Captain in law enforcement.

legion

At no time during the past history of human experience on this earth has a True Messenger been afforded the opportunity to have his words recorded in the courts of law established by humanity.  The trial in which Christopher is engaged is unprecedented.  Technology now allows Christopher’s words to be recorded and the evidence that he presents to become part of a legal record that can be accessed by anyone interested to know the Real Truth about this work*.

Christopher’s predecessor in this *Marvelous Work and a Wonder®, Joseph Smith, Jr., was not allowed the opportunity.  Although Joseph was taken to court on numerous occasions, although he was incarcerated many times, his actual testimony and anything that he might have said in court were not recorded.

The real facts regarding what happened to Joseph Smith as he pleaded for justice and to be allowed due process of law are well known, but often ignored.

In October of 1838, then Missouri Governor, Lilburn Boggs, signed an Executive Order stating that Joseph and his followers “must be treated as enemies, and must be exterminated or driven from the State if necessary for the public peace—their outrages are beyond all description.”

According to the U.S. Constitution and the law of the land, Governor Boggs was the highest legal authority in Missouri.  Boggs had the power to grant clemency to and pardon anyone of any crime or act.  Instead of protecting Joseph Smith and the early Mormons, the highest legal authority in the land issued an Extermination Order.

Very few of the courts in which he was forced to appear … which “courts” are actually just one person–a judge, and in Joseph’s day the courts were all male … gave Joseph the guarantee of due process of law as outlined in the U.S. Constitution.  Although the United States touts itself as a system of law and order, and that its Constitution is unmatched when compared with other nations’ Constitutions, well did we write of the United States’ version of law and order through its judges and lawyers.

As you consider what we wrote in the Book of Mormon below, do not overlook this very important part:

“…if the time should come that the voice of this people should choose iniquity, that is, if the time should come that this people should fall into transgression, they would be ripe for destruction.”  (Book of Mormon, Alma 10:19)

The people of the United States approve their Constitution.  They “choose” their judges and the way that their court system works.  Judges and lawyers make the law.  These judges and lawyers are the “law of the land.” This law, the “Court” is what the people of the United States have chosen to control their lives.

The Book of Mormon stories were specifically intended for the people living in the United States of America.  The allegoric stories were written with the intent to warn the American people of the acceptance of a corrupt court system where the only litigants that win are represented by lawyers who are paid a lot of money.  We wrote of them,

“Now the object of these lawyers was to get gain; and they got gain according to their employ.

Now, it was for the sole purpose to get gain, because they received their wages according to their employ, therefore, they did stir up the people to riotings, and all manner of disturbances and wickedness, that they might have more employ, that they might get money according to the suits which were brought before them.”  (Book of Mormon, Alma 10:32, 11:20)


Alma, chapter 10:

17 Now they knew not that Amulek [a True Messenger] could know of their designs. But it came to pass as they began to question him, he perceived their thoughts, and he said unto them: O ye wicked and perverse generation, ye lawyers and hypocrites, for ye are laying the foundations of the devil; for ye are laying traps and snares to catch the holy ones of God.

18 Ye are laying plans to pervert the ways of the righteous, and to bring down the wrath of God upon your heads, even to the utter destruction of this people.

19 Yea, well did Mosiah say, who was our last king, when he was about to deliver up the kingdom, having no one to confer it upon, causing that this people should be governed by their own voices—yea, well did he say that if the time should come that the voice of this people should choose iniquity, that is, if the time should come that this people should fall into transgression, they would be ripe for destruction.

20 And now I say unto you that well doth the Lord judge of your iniquities; well doth he cry unto this people, by the voice of his angels: Repent ye, repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.

21 Yea, well doth he cry, by the voice of his angels that: I will come down among my people, with equity and justice in my hands.

22 Yea, and I say unto you that if it were not for the prayers of the righteous, who are now in the land, that ye would even now be visited with utter destruction; yet it would not be by flood, as were the people in the days of Noah, but it would be by famine, and by pestilence, and the sword.

23 But it is by the prayers of the righteous that ye are spared; now therefore, if ye will cast out the righteous from among you then will not the Lord stay his hand; but in his fierce anger he will come out against you; then ye shall be smitten by famine, and by pestilence, and by the sword; and the time is soon at hand except ye repent.

24 And now it came to pass that the people were more angry with Amulek, and they cried out, saying: This man doth revile against our laws which are just, and our wise lawyers whom we have selected.

25 But Amulek stretched forth his hand, and cried the mightier unto them, saying: O ye wicked and perverse generation, why hath Satan got such great hold upon your hearts? Why will ye yield yourselves unto him that he may have power over you, to blind your eyes, that ye will not understand the words which are spoken, according to their truth?

26 For behold, have I testified against your law? Ye do not understand; ye say that I have spoken against your law; but I have not, but I have spoken in favor of your law, to your condemnation.

27 And now behold, I say unto you, that the foundation of the destruction of this people is beginning to be laid by the unrighteousness of your lawyers and your judges.

28 And now it came to pass that when Amulek had spoken these words the people cried out against him, saying: Now we know that this man is a child of the devil, for he hath lied unto us; for he hath spoken against our law. And now he says that he has not spoken against it.

29 And again, he has reviled against our lawyers, and our judges.

30 And it came to pass that the lawyers put it into their hearts that they should remember these things against him.

31 And there was one among them whose name was Zeezrom. Now he was the foremost to accuse Amulek and Alma, he being one of the most expert among them, having much business to do among the people.

32 Now the object of these lawyers was to get gain; and they got gain according to their employ.


 

Needless to say,  Joseph Smith didn’t stand a chance with the law during his day.

We mandated that Joseph Smith take his pleas for justice to the highest legal authority in the United States: to U.S. President Martin Van Buren.  In the winter of 1839, Joseph arrived with a few friends in Washington D.C. to plead with Congress to help him and his followers.  They were ignored.  Joseph was granted a limited personal audience with President Van Buren.  The gist of Van Buren’s comments to Joseph were, as remembered by the few who went with Joseph: “What can I do? I can do nothing for you, -if I do anything, I shall come in contact with the whole State of Missouri.” 

Consider what recorded American history did with what should have been Joseph Smith’s historical visit with the President of the United States.  The meeting cannot be proven.  Many have attested to the visit, but “in Van Buren’s own papers, now part of the Library of Congress, Manuscript Division, the visit is not described.  The several newspaper reports that later noted Joseph Smith and his small entourage’s presence in Washington did not mention him visiting with Van Buren.”  The visit was mentioned by a few other politicians in their memoirs but there is no substantial evidence that Joseph met with the President.

Politicians, judges, and lawyers did everything that they could to distance themselves from Joseph Smith and what was considered Mormonism.  Joseph Smith and his new religion, which was not our religion, but was allowed to be established in Joseph’s name for the people because they desired it (see Book of Mormon, Jacob 4:14), were not protected under the U.S. Constitution as its laws and purpose required.  The U.S. Constitution is clearly explicit about religious belief:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”  (First Amendment)

The early Mormons, although their religion was just as corrupt and far from the Sermon on the Mount as any other in that day, were persecuted and not afforded protection under the law.

Keep in mind what “the law” is.  The “law” is usually just one person, a judge, who decides whatever he or she wants to decide about the “law.”  The Court not only consists of the judge, but it also consists of the officers of the Court: attorneys.  In Joseph’s day, it was very hard for him to find an attorney who would represent him in court.  Attorneys do not want to offend the judges in front of whom they must appear for other cases for which they are employed.

Nothing has changed since Joseph’s day.  It is the same.

We counseled Christopher to release his attorney and proceed in self-representation (pro se).  His former counsel did not represent Christopher or his case properly.  This fact will be included in the appeals that Christopher makes as he engages the Court in the case in which he is involved.

There is nothing in Christopher’s character that motivates him to want to be in court.  In one final attempt to help him understand the futility of having another represent him and our work in a court of law in the United States, we allowed him to plead with his former attorney to reenter the case.  His former attorney was devastated that he was being asked to reenter as counsel.  His former attorney (a Utah attorney) informed him that he could not convince the Idaho attorney who had been retained in the case previously to reenter the case.  Both of these attorneys are LDS/Mormon.

We counseled Christopher to represent himself, as this was our intent from the beginning.  Our stories in the Book of Mormon show the corrupt nature of the legal system in all aspects, judges and lawyers.  There is no good in any court of law.  The Sermon on the Mount clearly details how a person should view and act toward a court of law:

Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.  And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak also.”  (Book of Mormon, Matthew 5:38-40.)

It has been Christopher’s frustration and contention with us to allow him to live the precepts of the Sermon on the Mount, which are the basis of human goodness and the “fullness of the everlasting Gospel of Jesus Christ” in which the American Christian is supposed to believe.  This is the true Gospel and code of humanity from the only true God that is in charge of each of us.  The Sermon on the Mount was the summary of social perfection that the Greek civilization had learned was the best for society.  (More on this in our book, The Dream of Mortal Life–Understanding Human Reality, A Final Warning to the Human Race.)

The role of a True Messenger is very difficult and often wrought with betrayal and confrontation by those who should be the closest to the Messenger.  In Joseph’s case, as it is also in Christopher’s, many of his closest supporters turned on him and were the cause of a great amount of his persecution.  Each of the three men to whom we allowed to be shown the gold plates left Joseph and began to ridicule and persecute him.

Christopher has shared with us a recent example of this that has greatly burdened him and caused us some discomfort.  There have been others who have been involved with us (those who are considered Christopher’s mentors and the overseers of the MWAW) on a personal basis.  There have been those who have seen the gold plates and witnessed the Urim and Thummim (the rocks) work in Christopher’s hands.

Without naming her specifically, one of his former supporters and friends was asked to sign an Affidavit for our defamation case against Harry Dschaak about her relations with us and concerning our work.  After receiving Christopher’s initial email in which he requested her assistance, she blocked Christopher from contacting her again.  We counseled Christopher to retain a Utah attorney to force her testimony by deposition.  We trust that when forced through legal proceedings she will not lie about her dealings with us and Christopher.  Upon pleading to this individual to reconsider signing an Affidavit of her testimony instead of forcing her testimony as a hostile witness, she has agreed to produce her Affidavit and testimony.  Her testimony is crucial to Christopher’s case, as she is one of very few people who has had personal contact with any of us.

Her husband was the one who responded,

“[She] has no desire for be involved with this in any way.  However, she is willing to sign an affidavit that reflects her recollection of events.  She will need some time to research out dates as best she can and will mail you the notarized documents when she is done.”

To which Christopher responded,

“Understand.  Well was it said, ‘Before the cock crow, thou shalt deny me.’  If you only knew the Real Truth ….  If only.  Your affidavit [that of the husband] would be appreciated but will not be compelled legally as you have no personal knowledge of the Bros.  We have no choice but to compel [her] testimony of the Real Truth for this trial.  I believe [her] Affidavit will serve its purpose.  She cannot be compelled to attend the trial.  Yeah … you know the story … Christ was on his way to trial when Peter denied knowing him and had ‘no desire to be involved in any way.’  Don’t you recall I called you guys out as ‘Peters’ years ago?  But anyways …  Not to worry.  It’s all good.  🙂  Love and peace to you and yours.”

This woman and her husband have accused Christopher of being mean and abusive to them personally because of a series of communications that he had with them distancing himself and the MWAW from them.  Christopher was not mean and abusive.  Christopher was wielding the “sickle” which he has continually warned all close to him to avoid.  This man does not know some details of Real Truth that would vindicate Christopher’s actions towards him and his wife, however, this vindication is not as valuable to our resolve as this woman’s testimony of her past involvement with us.

This man and his wife have turned from Christopher, and as we allegorically presented this action through Joseph Smith’s endowment presentation, “tapped Lucifer on the shoulder wanting to be paid.”  Their worldly aspirations and desires outweigh their desire to support Christopher and our work.  There has been only one time of past that we allowed Christopher to solicit for money to help him personally.  Christopher and Sheryl Nemelka, his wife, were forced into a need of vacancy of habitation to protect Christopher from his enemies at the time.  Christopher asked for donations for a traveling Recreational Vehicle.  This man and woman donated the bulk of what was needed and allowed the purchase.  It is our intent, when finances allow, to repay this man and his wife for their donation so that no monetary means precludes their future actions that might negatively impact Christopher and our work.

It is our desire that Christopher continually tells the Real Truth in all things.  However, to protect this man, this woman, and their innocent children and families who want nothing to do with Christopher or our work, it is Christopher’s desire to keep some details of Real Truth in dealing with this couple to himself.  We support Christopher in this desire.  Christopher has warned this woman that if she publicly turns on him or prevaricates what she knows to be the Real Truth about her association with us and with Christopher, he will be forced to reveal the Real Truth of all things concerning her in order to protect the integrity of the MWAW.

There was a time when Christopher wanted to reveal all things in truth, including his interactions with this woman.  We counseled him, explaining, “communicating the Real Truth should not supersede love and compassion.”  Although Christopher will not lie again, his personal love and compassion for others will prohibit him from revealing certain and particular Real Truths that are not relevant to our work.  This woman can be assured that the Real Truth that only she, Christopher, and a few others know, will be safe for her protection and that of her innocent children.  We appreciate this woman.  Although she has turned against us in Christopher, her aid and assistance in the past were invaluable.  We will do all we can to protect her but require her testimony of truth.

The greatest cause of misery and frustration to both Joseph and Christopher was and is their supporters.  As Christopher explained to the man above, and has so named it in the past, it is the cause of the “Peter Syndrome.”

The Greek authors of the Jesus stories knew of what had happened to many Greek philosophers when one of them stood for a truth that did not agree with society in general.  Their friends and family often scattered in order to protect themselves.  This is consistent with the natural effects and responses of our mortal self to the needs of our true self.  Consider this important Real Truth upon which Christopher will expound in The Dream of Mortal Life book:

Our mortal dreams are experiences generated by our physical brain in order to balance the effects of the daily sensory responses by which our brain is affected by the environment.  None of us compels our dreams or directs how a dream is going to play out in our mind.  The mortal dream experience is an uncontrollable direct and natural response to environmental stimuli, especially to the other humans with whom we interact in the environment.

Our mortal lives are experiences generated by our advanced physical brain in order to balance the effects of the daily sensory responses by which our brain is affected by the environment in our perfect world.  However, unlike the inefficiency and subdued power and abilities of our mortal brain, our advanced brain has the ability to effectuate changes in what we perceive as our mortal experience and direct the course of our mortal lives to some degree.  If, however, our mortal self responds to its mortal environment because of the actions of other free-willed humans with whom we associate in said environment, often these responses are not our advanced human will, but are a forced result of dealing in experience with other humans whose advanced and mortal brains’ needs are different than our own.

Although our mortal lives seem so real, conscious, and guided, this reality is actually a cause and perpetuation of the enhanced abilities and power of our advanced brain.  While dreaming as a mortal, however, the experience to our dream self seems just as real, conscious, and guided as our awakened mortal life.

We say the above, for this reason:

Christopher’s brain allows him access to his true experience and environment.  He knows and recognizes people based on his memory of whom he associates with as an advanced human.  Many of his friends and supporters here in mortality are close to him as advanced humans.  But as they act and react as mortals, because of the decisions of others, their mortal self is often obstructed in its efforts to be true to the needs of their advanced brain.  (This is the case of the man and woman mentioned above who were once Christopher’s supporters but have now chosen to stay away from the MWAW.)

Although Christopher has lost many friends and supporters throughout his involvement in the MWAW, none of them has ever, nor can they without extreme emotional repercussions, deny the Real Truths that they have learned through our work.  These former friends and supporters might turn on Christopher, abuse him, lie about him, cause him heartache and pain, all of which Christopher immediately forgives them.  But as it is written in an allegorical sense, although they may be as a “Peter” and deny their support of Christopher, they will not “deny the Holy Ghost.”

Harry Dschaak is not an advanced friend or close associate of Christopher.  However, Harry Dschaak’s true self is an advanced human of great intelligence, beauty, and prose.  Harry Dschaak could feel the Real Truth of the things he was beginning to understand by becoming involved in the MWAW.  He could not deny these things.  But once he was publicly opposed and ridiculed by Christopher to stop him from taking advantage of others in the name of the MWAW, instead of doing what many have done in Christopher’s past (an example is given of the man and woman above) and distancing himself from Christopher and the MWAW, Harry Dschaak began to “deny the Holy Ghost.”  His mortal emotions are out of control.  As it is written,

“Wherefore I say unto you, All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men: but the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven unto men.

And whosoever speaketh a word against the [one like unto the] Son of man [Christopher], it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come.”  (Matthew 12:31, 32)

The evidence that will come through the court case of defamation will clearly show how our mortal brain responds to denying the Real Truth once we have been shown it and it makes sense to us.  Mr. Dschaak knew the Real Truth.  His “Holy Ghost” confirmed it.  But then he denied it.  The physical (shaking and trembling) and emotional way that he has responded to and is responding to Christopher’s defense of the Real Truth gives evidence of what happens when “it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come.”  In other words, the actions of Mr. Dschaak’s mortal self “shall not be forgiven him” by his true self.

All he had to do was walk away from Christopher and the MWAW.  Like so many have before, and so many will in the future.  But Mr. Dschaak has no other value in his life but fighting the Real Truth and the “Holy Ghost.”  We can assure Mr. Dschaak that his emotional problems have just begun.  He has experienced nothing compared to what awaits him in his own mind.

Another of our and Christopher’s most bitter enemies, but who was not a supporter of us, has provided his testimony in the defamation case that he is one of the “Legion” that posted many defamatory statements on the critical website, http://www.chrisnemelka.com.  His name is David Ralph Bishop.  He is a former law enforcement officer. In his Affidavit of David Ralph Bishop, filed in this case on October 30, 2018, Mr. Bishop states:

“‘Legion’ as referenced in said Response to Interrogatory No. 3 was a group of individuals, including myself, who made occasional postings on chrisnemelka.com.  I do not know all of the individuals who posted as ‘Legion’ on chrisnemelka.com.”

Then, in an effort to defend some of Mr. Dschaak’s statements,  Mr. Bishop contradicts his own testimony, stating,

However, I do know that Defendant, Harry Dschaak, was not a member of ‘Legion’ who posted on chrisnemelka.com.”

Christopher’s cross-examination of Mr. Bishop will be quite clear:  If you do not know all of the individuals who posted as ‘Legion’ on chrisnemelka.com, how do you know that the Defendant was not one of them?

Mr. Bishop’s only interaction with Christopher was for a short few minutes in a Utah restaurant when Christopher told him that Mr. Bishop knew nothing of Real Truth about the LDS temple endowment.  Mr. Bishop exploded in anger.  Christopher immediately excused himself knowing that Mr. Bishop was an ex-law enforcement officer and was always armed with a concealed weapon.

Christopher has had nothing to do with Mr. Bishop since.  But Mr. Bishop’s true self (God) has.

Shortly after the confrontation, during one of Christopher’s “visits” to our real world, Mr. Bishop’s true self approached Christopher and with a smile assured Christopher that this advanced human’s mortal brain would “require of itself” the repercussions for “denying the Holy Ghost.”  Mr. Bishop had a serious stroke that left him somewhat debilitated.  Mr. Bishop’s wife threatened to leave him if he continued to burden their lives with his involvement with Mr. Dschaak on the http://www.chrisnemelka.com website.  How do we know these things about Mr. Bishop?  Christopher knows “God.”

It is our hope that Mr. Bishop attends trial to be cross examined by a True Messenger.  Mr. Bishop was present at court when Christopher first appeared before the judge in the case, Robert C. Naftz.  He confronted Christopher outside of court.  Christopher asked him what happened [Christopher already knew] because Mr. Bishop walks with a cane and has obviously had a serious stroke.  Mr. Bishop responded, “We don’t talk about that.”

We just did.

The mental and physical repercussions that await Mr. Bishop are serious.  One day his mortal brain will no longer be able to control his mortal body.  But his mind will remain alert and conscious, filled with hate, vengeance, and spite against Christopher for telling the Real Truth.  As he awaits his mortal death, his “God” will not be there to provide mental comfort.  Like Mr. Dschaak, Mr. Bishop is a mean and vengeful man whose God will allow him to experience the effects of this meanness.

Nothing that Mr. Dschaak or Mr. Bishop, or any group of ‘Legion’ can or will do will stop the Real Truth from coming forth to this world.  They may try.  But in the end, the Real Truth will prevail.

Through the course of this court case, Nemelka vs. Dschaak, Case No. CV-2016-389, filed in the Power County District Court, American Falls, Idaho, the Real Truth will finally have its chance to be heard and recorded in a “court of law.”  Judge Naftz is viscerally prejudiced against Christopher, as all “court of law” have been to all True Messengers.  But this will not deter Christopher from proceeding in the case.  We will use all appeal options available to seek justice.

This case is about religious freedom and the protection from the Harry Dschaaks and David Bishops of the world.  Joseph Smith was brutally murdered by the Dschaaks and Bishops of his day.  Joseph Smith was not allowed to confront his accusers and enemies in court.

Christopher will confront them for him.

We have set up this new Category of information for the MWAW website, “Critic’s Corner.”

We will allow any to make comments.

When time allows him, Christopher will respond.

We will be posting the evidence of the defamation case here as it is presented in court, and also many things that Judge Naftz will not allow to be presented in court.

On October 26, 2018, the judge limited the number of Mr. Dschaak’s defamatory statements to just a few to be presented at trial.   There are many others that we will share here in Critic’s Corner along with the evidence that proves their falsity and maliciousness.

Whether it’s Christopher or one of us responding to the critics’ comments, our words are the same.

We welcome critique.

Mr. Dschaak’s and Mr. Bishop’s critical website http://www.chrisnemelka.com did not allow anyone to defend Christopher, nor Christopher to defend himself against the course which “Legion” took in its efforts to discredit and defame Christopher.

Well did these wolves chose their name, Legion.

“What is thy name? And he said, Legion: because many devils were entered into him.” (Luke 8:30)

We ask the world to watch this court case.  Watch as a True Messenger casts Legion into the swine where they belong.

 

 

One Comment

  1. Craig Nichols

    It pains me greatly that I must communicate with others using scripture. It is through their belief and understanding it is the ultimate in knowledge and truth. I want to offer my support to Christopher, who I believe is genuine, by quoting a few scriptures to explain why I will always follow this work and appreciate him.

    Christopher and the brothers have given me that rock upon which the floods and winds cannot prevail and have helped me better access the light within me as noted in the Book of Mormon verse.

    The words of Timothy are not harsh to the MWAW, they do not fail to heed these words and no guilt on their part is warranted or needed. The real truth protects them.

    The words of Christ, always so powerful, again offers my support to a messenger rejected and shunned by so many. He does not tell me what commandments I must follow for my salvation to find Christ. He does not instruct me on how to live my life. He suggests I figure it out for myself and do what makes me happy.

    He suggests I leave the MWAW and follow after my own heart. He suggests I be guiltless before him and not worry about my lack of contribution in any meaningful way.

    And yet, here I stand. I am not legion, I am just being myself!

    The Book of Mormon states in 3rd Nephi 11:

    40 And whoso shall declare more or less than this, and establish it for my doctrine, the same cometh of evil, and is not built upon my rock; but he buildeth upon a sandy foundation, and the gates of hell stand open to receive such when the floods come and the winds beat upon them.

    The scripture above is comparable to a New Testament verse.

    Timothy states:

    …that thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine,
    4 Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do.
    5 Now the end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart, and of a good conscience, and of faith unfeigned:
    6 From which some having swerved have turned aside unto vain jangling;
    7 Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm.

    Christ says in Luke 17:

    20 ¶ And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation:
    21 Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.
    22 And he said unto the disciples, The days will come, when ye shall desire to see one of the days of the Son of man, and ye shall not see it.
    23 And they shall say to you, See here; or, see there: go not after them, nor follow them.

    Mark 13:
    21 And then if any man shall say to you, Lo, here is Christ; or, lo, he is there; believe him not:
    22 For false Christs and false prophets shall rise, and shall shew signs and wonders, to seduce, if it were possible, even the elect.

    Matthew 24:
    23 Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or there; believe it not.
    24 For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.

    It is my belief the MWAW is the ultimate source of truth. I do not need to explain to others what I know so fully myself.

    Please feel free, if it is your desire for your personal happiness, to use these same scriptures to condemn Christopher. I will take no part in such an effort, but I will understand despite my own personal disappointment and disagreement. I have no desire to make all people around me like myself, but instead to appreciate and treat those I come in contact with as equal human beings (and that means kindness toward Christopher and the MWAW as well).

    It is through the free will of others that enables my existence to live in peace on this earth; and through the tenderness from others, I am able to provide the same for them despite conflicting beliefs and opinions.

    I do not see the conflict of this court case coming from the Real Truth of the MWAW, I see it coming from human nature itself that the Book of Mormon states is an enemy to God. I accept the conflict and embrace it, because it is through the free will of others this conflict exists! And yet, all that is needed is to walk away. It is disappointing, but it is also acceptable.

    Best regards,

    Craig

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s