Martin Luther King, Sr: a champion of God’s New and Everlasting Covenant and a friend of the “Three Nephites” and “John the Beloved.”

a-gift-of-love-20

It would have been Martin Luther King, Jr.’s 90th birthday today.

In celebration of his life, we thought it appropriate to give him a gift.  This gift is a clear explanation of the New and Everlasting Covenant, even from the beginning, consistent with the “work of the Father” that was commenced with this Marvelous Work and a Wonder® according to the clues we have given the world.

First we will speak of his father, Martin Luther King, Sr., who inspired the course of action taken by his son as a trumpet for civil rights.

As a boy growing up in Georgia, King, Sr. often worked in the fields.  It was not uncustomary for “civilized” native Americans (particularly of South America) to work alongside the darker-skinned laborers of early America.

Two of us are native American.  While all four of us were living in the counties of Henry, Clayton, and Fulton, at the time, only the darker skinned of us worked alongside the African American enslaved.

All four of us resided in the United States at this time to do what we could to influence the Civil Rights Movement of that time period.

Working alongside the enslaved, we would join their voice and chorus for change and give humble opinions of what would help, warning against those things (violence, armed uprisings and protests) that would only cause the poor more misery.

It has always been our course in life to insert our presence in the areas of the world where we think would do the most good (“seemeth us good”).

As we observed the elder King as he developed through his early years, it was apparent to us that he would have some effect on change in the United States.

We seek to make our lives consistent with fulfilling the purpose for which humans exist in mortality.  These acts are consistent with our advanced Self’s needs of the mortal experience.  Therefore, we attempt the things that we choose to do “in the name of” this work.

Thus we wrote,

“And they are as the angels of God, and if they shall pray unto the Father in the name of Jesus they can show themselves unto whatsoever man it seemeth them good.”  (BOM, 3 Nephi 28:30)

All four of us were present in New York City in April of 1967, when Martin Luther King, Jr. gave one of his most powerful speeches.  Speaking against the Vietnam War, in which the United States was engaged to the destruction of hundreds of thousands of innocent poor living in that part of the world, Junior spoke:

“Even when pressed by the demands of inner truth, men do not easily assume the task of opposing their government’s policy, especially in time of war.  Nor does the human spirit move without great difficulty against all the apathy of conformist thought within one’s own bosom and in the surrounding world. …

“Some of us who have already begun to break the silence of the night have found that the calling to speak is often a vocation of agony, but we must speak. …

“Perhaps a new spirit is rising among us.  If it is, let us trace its movement, and pray that our inner being may be sensitive to its guidance.  For we are deeply in need of a new way beyond the darkness that seems so close around us. …

“There is at the outset a very obvious and almost facile connection between the war in Vietnam and the struggle I and others have been waging in America.  A few years ago there was a shining moment in that struggle.  It seemed as if there was a real promise of hope for the poor, both black and white, through the poverty program.  There were experiments, hopes, new beginnings.  Then came the buildup in Vietnam, and I watched this program broken and eviscerated as if it were some idle political plaything on a society gone mad on war.  And I knew that America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued to draw men and skills and money like some demonic, destructive suction tube.  So I was increasingly compelled to see the war as an enemy of the poor and to attack it as such. …

“As I have walked among the desperate, rejected, and angry young men, I have told them that Molotov cocktails and rifles would not solve their problems.  I have tried to offer them my deepest compassion while maintaining my conviction that social change comes most meaningfully through nonviolent action.  But they asked, and rightly so, “What about Vietnam?”  They asked if our own nation wasn’t using massive doses of violence to solve its problems, to bring about the changes it wanted.  Their questions hit home, and I knew that I could never again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today: my own government.  For the sake of those boys, for the sake of this government, for the sake of the hundreds of thousands trembling under our violence, I cannot be silent.

“Because I believe that the Father is deeply concerned, especially for His suffering and helpless and outcast children, I come tonight to speak for them.  This I believe to be the privilege and the burden of all of us who deem ourselves bound by allegiances and loyalties which are broader and deeper than nationalism and which go beyond our nation’s self-defined goals and positions.  We are called to speak for the weak, for the voiceless, for the victims of our nation, for those it calls ‘enemy,’ for no document from human hands can make these humans any less our brothers. …

“In 1957 a sensitive American official overseas said that it seemed to him that our nation was on the wrong side of a world revolution.  During the past ten years we have seen emerge a pattern of suppression which has now justified the presence of U.S. military advisors in Venezuela.  This need to maintain social stability for our investments accounts for the counterrevolutionary action of American forces in Guatemala.  It tells why American helicopters are being used against guerrillas in Cambodia and why American napalm and Green Beret forces have already been active against rebels in Peru.

“It is with such activity that the words of the late John F. Kennedy come back to haunt us.  Five years ago he said,

‘Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.’

“Increasingly, by choice or by accident, this is the role our nation has taken, the role of those who make peaceful revolution impossible by refusing to give up the privileges and the pleasures that come from the immense profits of overseas investments.  I am convinced that if we are to get on to the right side of the world revolution, we as a nation must undergo a radical revolution of values.  We must rapidly begin, we must rapidly begin the shift from a thing-oriented society to a person-oriented society.  When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights, are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, extreme materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered. …

“A genuine revolution of values means in the final analysis that our loyalties must become ecumenical rather than sectional. Every nation must now develop an overriding loyalty to mankind as a whole in order to preserve the best in their individual societies. …

“This call for a worldwide fellowship that lifts neighborly concern beyond one’s tribe, race, class, and nation is in reality a call for an all-embracing and unconditional love for all mankind.  This oft misunderstood, this oft misinterpreted concept, so readily dismissed by the Nietzsches of the world as a weak and cowardly force, has now become an absolute necessity for the survival of man.  When I speak of love I am not speaking of some sentimental and weak response.  I’m not speaking of that force which is just emotional bosh.  I am speaking of that force which all of the great religions have seen as the supreme unifying principle of life.  Love is somehow the key that unlocks the door which leads to ultimate reality.  This Hindu-Muslim-Christian-Jewish-Buddhist belief about ultimate reality is beautifully summed up in the first epistle of Saint John:

‘Let us love one another, for love is God.  And every one that loveth is born of God and knoweth God.  He that loveth not knoweth not God, for God is love. . . . If we love one another, God dwelleth in us and his love is perfected in us.’

“Let us hope that this spirit will become the order of the day.

“We can no longer afford to worship the god of hate or bow before the altar of retaliation.  The oceans of history are made turbulent by the ever-rising tides of hate.  History is cluttered with the wreckage of nations and individuals that pursued this self-defeating path of hate.

“As Arnold Toynbee says:

‘Love is the ultimate force that makes for the saving choice of life and good against the damning choice of death and evil. Therefore the first hope in our inventory must be the hope that love is going to have the last word.’ …

“And if we will only make the right choice, we will be able to transform this pending cosmic elegy into a creative psalm of peace.  If we will make the right choice, we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our world into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood.  If we will but make the right choice, we will be able to speed up the day, all over America and all over the world, when justice will roll down like waters, and righteousness like a mighty stream.”

(End of excerpts Martin Luther King, Jr.’s speech.)

Even when pressed by the demands of inner truth, men do not easily assume the task of opposing their government’s policy.  Nor does the human spirit move without great difficulty against all the apathy of conformist thought within one’s own bosom and in the surrounding world.

The “demands of inner truth” are being made by our advanced brain’s natural function to participate in an experience upon Earth that supports its needs.  Unconditional individual freedom to act and be acted upon is what our advanced brain needs.  This is the “inner truth” that speaks from our soul and resonates in our hearts.  This is the Spirit of Real Truth, the Spirit of Christ of which we speak and have written.

It is hard to move the spirit of those who conform to the Ministries of Lucifer’s Religions (including all forms of science and philosophy) in the surrounding world.  These ministries create apathy because the conformist fights their own “inner truth” in order to conform, be accepted and valued.

A nation must undergo a radical revolution of values.  We must rapidly begin, we must rapidly begin the shift from a thing-oriented society to a person-oriented society.  When machines and computers, profit motives and property rights, are considered more important than people, the giant triplets of racism, extreme materialism, and militarism are incapable of being conquered.

The Humanity Party® has presented the solution that the world must move from a material-based economy to a human-based economy, without impeding free will of any mortal.  There is no other way to save the human race.

Martin Luther King, Jr., although he could eloquently present the problem, and with oratory skill complain, had no solution that would work.  No matter how peaceful the protests and gatherings that were held in his name, his own pride got in the way of considering the solutions that we presented to him by “praying unto the Father in the name of Jesus.”

“And they are as the angels of God, and if they shall pray unto the Father in the name of Jesus they can show themselves unto whatsoever man it seemeth them good”  (BOM, 3 Nephi 28:30)

We met with Thomas Jefferson shortly before Joseph’s birth in 1805, and presented the outline of a political platform of reform that is known today as The Humanity Party®.  Jefferson rejected our ideas.

Posing as concerned foreign diplomats shortly before Christopher’s birth in 1961, we presented the same outline to Martin Luther King, Jr.  He rejected our ideas.

Had Jefferson accepted our ideas and used his power and popularity to support and promote them, there would have been no need for Joseph or The Book of Mormon—Another Testament of Jesus Christ.  Jefferson’s efforts would have been a sufficient attempt to present the only solution to the world’s social problems that would work.

Had King accepted our ideas and used his power and popularity to support and promote them, there would have been no need for Christopher or The Sealed Portion—The Final Testament of Jesus Christ.

There has never been a popular political or religious leader who has supported and promoted a viable plan that would solve poverty and inequality throughout the world.  There have been some who have threatened the wealthy and their personal use of unconditional free will.  None of these had the correct plan.  The free will of a mortal to pursue riches and place him or herself above others in material things must never be impeded.

Neither Jefferson nor King understood or promoted the right for the wealthy to enrich themselves by supplying the world with the basic necessities of human life—”a genuine revolution of values [that is] ecumenical rather than sectional.”

King’s words were powerful, but futile:

A genuine revolution of values means in the final analysis that our loyalties must become ecumenical rather than sectional. Every nation must now develop an overriding loyalty to mankind as a whole in order to preserve the best in their individual societies.

King could never explain or present a blueprint that would work for “every nation … [in developing] an overriding loyalty to mankind as a whole in order to preserve the best in their individual societies.”  There can be no “individual societies” outside of the human society, unless each of these “societies” is the individual.

Jefferson was wealthy and worked with the wealthy in effort to make the changes necessary that protected free will … but not the free will of the enslaved that Jefferson and the wealthy needed in order to gain and maintain their wealth.

Martin Luther King, Sr. learned most of what he knew by working in the fields with the enslaved and listening to their complaints.  To instill this firsthand knowledge in his son, Junior was often required to work in the fields and in the ghettos and slums of the city among the poor.  It was our hope that when Junior reached maturity he would listen to and recognize the “inner truth” of The Humanity Party®’s economic plan, which is the “work of the Father” … which is the “prayer of the Father” … and that which those pursue who “pray unto the Father in the name of Jesus.”

Even when pressed by the demands of inner truth, men do not easily assume the task of opposing their government’s policy.  Nor does the human spirit move without great difficulty against all the apathy of conformist thought within one’s own bosom and in the surrounding world.

Jefferson wouldn’t oppose his government’s policy.

King rejected our plan because he chose to conform “to the surrounding world,” to dress in nice clothing and speak eloquently, mesmerizing his followers to honor him and his persona.  To maintain his popularity in the world, King performed.  Who King was in public wasn’t always who he was in private.  It was difficult for King to move against his own apathy of conformity.

Consider a comparison between King and Christopher.  Christopher is not popular in the world.  He does not wear fine clothing and present himself as a strong orator.  Who Christopher is in public, he is in private.  Those who know Christopher see his same character in private as they do in public.  Christopher’s profanity and pretended arrogance repels the apathetic who conform to the surrounding world.  For this reason, we have shown ourselves unto him according to the clue of our associations with other mortals:

“And they are as the angels of God, and if they shall pray unto the Father in the name of Jesus they can show themselves unto whatsoever man it seemeth them good.”  (BOM, 3 Nephi 28:30)

The Marvelous Work and a Wonder® presents the only true God’s New and Everlasting Covenant of the Father.  There is no other.  It is not a covenant related to religion, it is a covenant that existed long before any religion developed upon Earth … “even that which was from the beginning.”

It does not conform to the apathy of the religious, especially not to that of the LDS/Mormon people.  The meaning and context in which Joseph Smith used the term “new and everlasting covenant” had nothing to do with the Abrahamic Covenant* or any priesthood agreement between God and man.

*The LDS/Mormon definition of the Abrahamic Covenant is very similar to the Jewish definition:

“Abraham made covenants with God when he received the gospel, when he was ordained a high priest, and when he entered into celestial marriage [i.e. plural marriage]. In these covenants, God promised great blessings to Abraham and his family. These blessings, which extend to all of Abraham’s seed, are called the Abrahamic covenant.”

Shortly after Joseph Smith was forced (see BOM, Jacob 4:14) to allow the people to organize a legal church in the United States, many men were confused as to what constituted their new religion and what “covenant” they were supposed to be obeying, and how [by what ordinance] they were supposed to enter into this covenant (promise) with God.  The Jews believe that circumcision is the way that males enter into this covenant with God.  Christian ideology accepts baptism as the ordinance in which a person makes his or her covenant with God.

The early Mormon men had a hard time giving up their former religious beliefs for a new religion.  It was known that Joseph often counseled with men to know what the men wanted their religion and church to be (see BOM, Jacob 4:14).  Many early Mormon men tried to tell Joseph about the importance of the Abrahamic Covenant, which would allow them to do what Abraham did: have more than one wife.

“Even when pressed by the demands of inner truth, men do not easily assume the task of opposing their [former religion].  Nor does the human spirit move without great difficulty against all the apathy of conformist thought within one’s own [religious] bosom.”

Barely a week had passed since the legal formation of the LDS/Mormon religion in the United States when out of frustration from listening to all the “counsel” he was receiving from the former male members of other U.S. religions, Joseph received the following “revelation from the Lord”:

Behold, I say unto you that all old covenants have I caused to be done away in this thing; and this is a new and an everlasting covenant, even that which was from the beginning.  Wherefore, although a man should be baptized an hundred times it availeth him nothing, for you cannot enter in at the strait gate by the law of Moses, neither by your dead works.  For it is because of your dead works that I have caused this last covenant and this church to be built up unto me, even as in days of old.  Wherefore, enter ye in at the gate, as I have commanded, and seek not to counsel your God.  Amen.  (Doctrine and Covenants, section 22)

As they often do, the LDS/Mormons only see what they want to see in a “revelation from the Lord.”

Joseph said, this is a new and an everlasting covenant, even that which was from the beginning.”

In the context in which Joseph was speaking for God, it is a covenant made between God and mankind long before Abraham was allegedly alive upon Earth.  It was a covenant between God and man

“who was also in the beginning with God”  (D&C 93:29)

“Ye were also in the beginning with the Father; that which is Spirit, even the Spirit of truth;

And truth is knowledge of things as they are, and as they were, and as they are to come;

And whatsoever is more or less than this is the spirit of that wicked one who was a liar from the beginning.” (D&C 93:23-25)

This contract between God and man has nothing to do with religion, church, priesthood, ordinance work, or anything else but “works that are not dead [i.e., bad].”

The early converts to Mormonism were not bad people, at least not according to their own apathetic, conformist religious beliefs.  But through Joseph, wasn’t God telling them that all of their religious works were bad; that the purpose for a new church was to allow a person to commit oneself (become baptized) to do works that are not dead … works that have been done since the beginning when man was with God … when man was God?

Joseph gave this early followers clues of our existence in association with “[God’s] everlasting covenant, even that which was from the beginning.”  Joseph explained “all men … are under sin, except those which I have reserved unto myself, holy men that ye know not of.”

Wherefore, I will that all men shall repent, for all are under sin, except those which I have reserved unto myself, holy men that ye know not of.  Wherefore, I say unto you that I have sent unto you mine everlasting covenant, even that which was from the beginning.  (D&C 49:7-9)

Would it not have behooved the early Mormon people to have inquired of Joseph as to who these “holy men” were and what they were doing that made their works “alive” (holy and good) instead of “dead” (evil)?

If they would have understood Joseph correctly in this clue they would have known that these “holy men reserved unto God” were the actual ones that were “sent unto you” with the new and everlasting covenant, even that which was from the beginning.”

Of this covenant, Joseph spoke as “the Lord” again and gave clear clues to what this covenant actually meant when Joseph (the Lord) spoke of the “dead works” of the early Mormons:

And this condemnation resteth upon the children of Zion, even all.

And they shall remain under this condemnation until they repent and remember the new covenant, even the Book of Mormon and the former commandments which I have given them, not only to say, but to do according to that which I have written— (D&C 84:56-57)

The “new covenant, even the Book of Mormon,” which contains the “fullness of the everlasting gospel delivered by the Savior,” was ignored by the early Mormons as it is by Modern Mormons.

Mormon men, especially, would rather think of the covenant that they make with God as Abrahamic, instead of something that supports the teachings and commandments of the Sermon on the Mount.  Mormon men are faithful to their priesthood calling, to ordinance work, to genealogy, to the “gospel” that they are taught by their religious leaders, a faithfulness in “works” that will allow them to enter “celestial marriage” and be known as a special priesthood holder in the special house of Israel, and as an adoptive son of Abraham, who was chosen by God above all other men who lived in the world.

And thus they were and are deceived.

They ignore our existence and that which we have been sent forth by the true God to give unto them, even the actual new and everlasting covenant between the true God and mortal kind.

A covenant is an agreement, a contract, a stipulation between two parties.  In the context that Joseph and Christopher have used God’s New and Everlasting Covenant, this agreement was made “in the beginning” between our True Self and our Mortal Self.

The agreement was this:

If you live in mortality in equality with others, in all things, you shall be allowed to participate in mortality forever.

True Self to our Mortal Self:  If you obey my commandments, you shall prosper in the land and inherit the promised land.

The “promised” land is the land (Earth) mentioned in the beginning as the place where we could experience mortality.

The condition of mortality is that all people be equal as to the availability of the resources of the “land of promise,” according to each person’s needs, according to each person’s wants.  This means that if one desires to be wealthy and accumulate more of Earth’s resources in order to make one feel good about oneself … or if this desire and act makes one happy, then that one must be afforded the opportunity to fulfill their desire and act upon it.

As advanced humans, it was okay with us (from the beginning) if some wanted to be wealthy, because that’s what their advanced brain needed from the mortal experience.  But the conditions of the covenants we made with each other mandate that one must become wealthy without impeding the free will of another who is not happy becoming wealthy.

The New and Everlasting Covenant is based on equality in regards to a human’s ability to pursue a mortal experience upon Earth (i.e., the land of promise) according to the individual desires of happiness unique to all of us.

Because the darker skinned races were not experiencing this equality, the Book of Mormon was intended to be a source of this new and everlasting covenant by explaining that the color of one’s mortal skin doesn’t matter.  The story explains that the darker skinned people became and were much more righteous than the lighter skinned people; that all were children of Abraham, of the “house of Israel.”

Martin Luther King, Sr. and Jr.’s struggle and desire to equalize their dark skin with those who held power and authority over them, although consistent with the everlasting covenant that we all made with our True Self before becoming mortal, did not protect the free will of the wealthy to pursue wealth.

We are the “holy men … sent unto you” with the true “everlasting covenant, even that which was from the beginning.”

If through Christopher, we would have established The Humanity Party® upon Earth during King’s time upon Earth, King would have rejected Christopher as he did us, because Christopher is not liked by many and is not an apathetic conformist to any religious ideal or belief.

Senator Bernie Sanders, as well as many others, had the popularity and power to present the “new and everlasting covenant” to their followers, but they chose to condemn the free will of the wealthy in their pursuit of happiness.

The Humanity Party® is the New and Everlasting Covenant that has existed from the beginning.  Equality is the underlying foundation of this political movement.  It is the right way.  It is the only way.  The world either commits to this covenant or the wrath of God will destroy it.

Here’s a modern example of how this covenant could work and what will happen if mortals fail to comply with the promise they made with God:

Many companies are engaged in the research and production of a fusion energy source.  Billions of dollars are being spent in this pursuit.

Consider this article:

Is Fusion Within Our Grasp?

The power emitted from sustained thermonuclear fusion is safe, carbon-free, and abundant.  The primary fuel – hydrogen isotopes – can be found in regular sea water, and just a few grams are enough to kick-start a reaction.

General Atomics, a manufacturer of the powerful magnets necessary for fusion plasma containment, estimates that a working reactor would only need 11 pounds of hydrogen to generate the energy equivalent of 18,750 tons of coal, 56,000 barrels of oil or 755 acres of solar panels – an amazing feat of science and technology.

The implications are near limitless.  Aside from the obvious benefits for combatting climate change, ending energy scarcity, and growing the global economy, fusion could also have applications for space travel and U.S. national security (provided we develop the technology first).

It’s no wonder, then, that a number of private entities are aggressively pursuing the technology. Lockheed Martin (NYSE:LMT) announced last year its plan to develop a prototype compact fusion reactor (CFR) within the next decade.  If it works, the truck-sized device would be capable of providing enough electricity to meet the demand of a small city of 100,000 people.  Lockheed is joined by TAE Technologies, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Plasma Fusion Center (MIT PSFC), and Canadian-backed General Fusion Inc., in a group of contenders promising to bring fusion commercialization before 2030.  Even Amazon’s (NYSE:AMZN) Jeff Bezos and Microsoft’s (NYSE:MSFT) Bill Gates have thrown their hats into the fusion power ring.

But don’t get too excited – this tricky technology has eluded scientists for more than 50 years.

The Fusion process is the same one that powers our sun (you can think of a star as one gigantic fusion reactor): hydrogen atoms forced together under immense heat and pressure break their atomic bonds, fusing into a new heavier element, helium.  Some mass is lost in the process, however, and great amounts of energy are released as a result.  This is what Einstein’s famous formula E=mc² describes: the tiny bit of lost mass (m), multiplied by the square of the speed of light (c²), results in a very large figure (E), which is the amount of energy created by a fusion reaction.

“This tricky technology has eluded scientists for more than 50 years” because “God” wouldn’t allow it to be understood.  Just as we did with atomic fission, knowledge that introduced the atomic age, as advanced humans (God) we purposefully limited the ability of mortals to access this understanding, which “is the same [process]” that created our sun.

The “number of private entities [that] are aggressively pursuing the technology” have a choice to make.  Their choice of action will determine the fate of this planet.  If they choose incorrectly, breaching the “new and everlasting covenant, even from the beginning,” then the “wrath of God” will destroy the Earth and all of its inhabitants.  If they choose “works” that are “alive” instead of “dead,” they will usher in a time of peace, prosperity and equality for all people, as was promised in the beginning.

They will either “obey the commandments and covenants of God” or they will destroyed.  It is their choice of action.

Once they have discovered the Fusion process and how it works, once they begin to produce energy through this process, they must begin to provide all humans upon Earth with free, sustainable electricity that will allow all of Earth’s inhabitants more opportunity to explore their individual desires of happiness.  No one will pay for utilities any longer.

With fusion power science will begin to understand how to turn plastic back into the basic components from which plastic is chemically bound.  Only through technologies associated with fusion will science be able to do this.  This will greatly decrease the world’s pollution problem.  In fact, fusion process-based recycling plants will be able to take apart anything and utilize the energy from the recycling process in eliminating it to produce energy.

If the “number of private entities [that] are aggressively pursuing the technology” would put their heads together, for the sake of humanity instead of for the sake of profit, the fusion process would already be part of our world.  Each of these “private entities [that] are aggressively pursuing the technology” have a piece of the puzzle.  Together, they could solve the remaining pieces that keep fusion technology from being a part of our world.

Unfortunately for the human race, the United States government is also  “aggressively pursuing the technology” and it has unlimited resources in the pursuit.  But the United States government is not pursuing the technology for peaceful purposes, especially not for the equalization of the human family, but for profit and “national security,” increasing their military power to take away free will and cause the rest of the world to bow to U.S. influence.

“God” is not going to allow this.  For this reason, “God” will not allow the U.S. to discover and implement the fusion process first.  But imagine the consequences thereof:

If China develops the process first, the implication will threaten the United States.  The United States responds to any threat to its “national security” with violent force or subversive collusion with anti-government factions (that are not anti-U.S.).

Well did we title our book that contains information that explains God’s New and Everlasting Covenant, even from the beginning666, The Mark of America—Seat of the Beast.

Well did we write that Revelation will unfold the end of the world in our Book of Mormon:

“And as there began to be wars and rumors of wars among all the nations which belonged to the mother of abominations, the angel spake unto me, saying: Behold, the wrath of God is upon the mother of harlots; and behold, thou seest all these things—

And when the day cometh that the wrath of God is poured out upon the mother of harlots, which is the great and abominable church of all the earth, whose founder is the devil, then, at that day, the work of the Father shall commence, in preparing the way for the fulfilling of his covenants, which he hath made to his people who are of the house of Israel.

And it came to pass that the angel spake unto me, saying: Look!

And I looked and beheld a man, and he was dressed in a white robe.

And the angel said unto me: Behold one of the twelve apostles of the Lamb.

Behold, he shall see and write the remainder of these things; yea, and also many things which have been.

And he shall also write concerning the end of the world.”  (BOM, 1 Nephi 14:16-22)

When the “wrath of God is poured upon the mother of harlots” … the United States of America … which means that our True Selves have given upon on the covenant we made with our mortal selves, then shall the process of fusion turn upon the world for the final time.

Happy Birthday Martin Luther King, Jr.

Your gift is “the work of the Father [that has] commenced.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s